<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Expectations</title>
	<atom:link href="http://southbydeepsouth.com/2008/03/14/expectations/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://southbydeepsouth.com/2008/03/14/expectations/</link>
	<description>South by Deep South</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 18:46:12 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Stephen</title>
		<link>http://southbydeepsouth.com/2008/03/14/expectations/#comment-49</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 02:22:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://southbydeepsouth.com/2008/03/14/expectations/#comment-49</guid>
		<description>I just heard about this from @lalunablanca, and would be willing to help.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just heard about this from @lalunablanca, and would be willing to help.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Chaney</title>
		<link>http://southbydeepsouth.com/2008/03/14/expectations/#comment-39</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Chaney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 13:05:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://southbydeepsouth.com/2008/03/14/expectations/#comment-39</guid>
		<description>SXSW this year, as I understand from those I follow at Twitter, was very much about people, socializing, parties...the sessions themselves (Sarah Lacy and the social media metrics panels notwithstanding) seem to take a back seat. I don't know if it was that companies are embracing SXSWi more than previously (hence, more parties), but it did seem that's what everyone was talking about. 

That being said, I don't know that we need to get too much more social than that. Personally, I put a lot of stock in having interesting, educational sessions. Maybe a barcamp, unconference approach, but still with some facilitated sessions as a skeleton at least. 

I do like the idea of five different tracks going on simultaneously based on interest areas. That's a good idea. 

Ike, please know that I'm happy to do whatever I can to help you make this happen. That includes doing grunt work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SXSW this year, as I understand from those I follow at Twitter, was very much about people, socializing, parties&#8230;the sessions themselves (Sarah Lacy and the social media metrics panels notwithstanding) seem to take a back seat. I don&#8217;t know if it was that companies are embracing SXSWi more than previously (hence, more parties), but it did seem that&#8217;s what everyone was talking about. </p>
<p>That being said, I don&#8217;t know that we need to get too much more social than that. Personally, I put a lot of stock in having interesting, educational sessions. Maybe a barcamp, unconference approach, but still with some facilitated sessions as a skeleton at least. </p>
<p>I do like the idea of five different tracks going on simultaneously based on interest areas. That&#8217;s a good idea. </p>
<p>Ike, please know that I&#8217;m happy to do whatever I can to help you make this happen. That includes doing grunt work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.463 seconds -->
